The short answer
Yes, provided the rent is a fair rental and the arrangement is documented and enforced like any other tenancy. Section 280A(d)(2)(A) treats occupancy by your family as your own personal use, which would defeat the investment holding requirement, but section 280A(d)(3)(A) lifts that treatment where the unit is rented at a fair rental for use as the occupant's principal residence. A commercial building leased to a company you control sits outside section 280A entirely and needs only market rent and a real lease.
At a glance
| The trap | Family occupancy is your personal use under §280A(d)(2)(A) |
|---|---|
| The release | Fair rental + occupant's principal residence = not personal use (§280A(d)(3)(A)) |
| Whose family | Spouse, siblings, ancestors, lineal descendants (§267(c)(4)) |
| Safe harbor link | Rev. Proc. 2008-16 §4.03 counts personal use under §280A(d)(2) with (d)(3) applied |
| Personal-use budget | Greater of 14 days or 10% of fair-rental days per 12-month period |
| Co-owner tenants | Need a shared equity financing agreement: interests over 50 years (§280A(d)(3)(B)-(D)) |
| Fair rental test | Facts and circumstances when the agreement is signed (Rev. Proc. 2008-16 §4.04) |
| Self-rental | Net rental income from your own trade or business is nonpassive (Reg. §1.469-2(f)(6)) |
A fair rental plus the tenant's principal residence is what converts family occupancy into investment use
Start with the trap. Section 280A(d)(2)(A) deems you to have used a dwelling unit for personal purposes on any day it is used by a member of your family as defined in section 267(c)(4), and it attaches no fair-rent proviso to that clause. On its face, letting your daughter live in the house makes every one of those days your own.
Section 280A(d)(3)(A) is the release valve and it is written in one sentence: a taxpayer "shall not be treated as using a dwelling unit for personal purposes by reason of a rental arrangement for any period if for such period such dwelling unit is rented, at a fair rental, to any person for use as such person's principal residence."
Two conditions, both required. The rent has to be a fair rental, and the house has to be the tenant's principal residence rather than their weekend place. Discount the rent or let them keep another main home and you are back inside 280A(d)(2)(A).
The dwelling-unit safe harbor imports the same two subsections, which is why the relief carries into your exchange
Section 4.03 of Rev. Proc. 2008-16 says personal use occurs on any day you are deemed to have used the unit for personal purposes "under §280A(d)(2) (taking into account §280A(d)(3) but not §280A(d)(4))." The parenthetical is the whole answer: a properly priced family tenancy does not consume your personal-use allowance.
Section 4.02(2) then asks, for each of the two 12-month periods after the exchange, that you rent the unit at a fair rental for 14 days or more and keep personal use to the greater of 14 days or 10 percent of the fair-rental days. A house your father occupies as his home for a full year is rented 365 days, so the allowance is 36 days, and none of his occupancy counts against it.
How long you must rent a replacement before moving in covers the two-year mechanics of that safe harbor; this page is only about who the tenant may be.
What a fair rental means when the tenant is your son, and how the Tax Court looked at it
Section 4.04 of the revenue procedure sets the standard: whether a unit is rented at a fair rental is judged on all the facts and circumstances existing when the rental agreement is entered into, taking all rights and obligations of the parties into account. It is the bargain you struck at signing, not a rent survey pulled three years later.
That flexibility is real but narrow. Legal 1031 reports that in William P. Adams v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2013-7, the IRS attacked a $1,200 monthly rent charged to the taxpayer's son on a dilapidated house, and the taxpayer prevailed by showing the rent was fair once the son's uncompensated work and out-of-pocket improvements were weighed.
Build the record before the first rent cheque rather than after an examination letter.
- A written lease with a term, a rent figure, a due date and a late-payment clause you are willing to enforce.
- Evidence of the market rent you relied on when you signed: comparable listings, a broker's letter or a property manager's opinion.
- Rent actually paid from the tenant's own funds and deposited, not offset informally against something else.
- The rent reported on Schedule E with depreciation and expenses claimed, which is how the return says you held the property for income.
- No arrangement to hand the rent back as a gift, which unwinds the fair-rental premise the whole position stands on.
A relative who owns a slice of the house needs a shared equity financing agreement
Section 280A(d)(3)(B)(i) withdraws the principal-residence relief where the occupant holds an interest in the unit, unless the rental is made under a shared equity financing agreement. Families who put a child on title to help with financing walk into this without noticing.
The definition is demanding. Section 280A(d)(3)(C) requires two or more people to acquire qualified ownership interests, with the occupant entitled to live there as a principal residence and obliged to pay rent to the other owners; section 280A(d)(3)(D) defines a qualified ownership interest as an undivided interest of more than 50 years in the entire dwelling unit and its land.
Where such an agreement exists, 280A(d)(3)(B)(ii) fixes the fair rental as of the time the agreement is entered into and adjusts it for the occupant's own ownership share. Adding a relative to title also raises a same-taxpayer question on the exchange itself; see adding or removing a spouse on title.
Leasing to a company you control is a different question with a simpler answer
Section 280A governs dwelling units, so a warehouse, clinic or retail bay leased to your own operating company is not touched by the personal-use rules at all. Section 1031 asks only that you hold the building for productive use in a trade or business or for investment, and a building leased at market rent to any tenant, including your own company, is held for exactly that.
The catch is elsewhere. Treas. Reg. §1.469-2(f)(6) recharacterizes rental income as nonpassive to the extent of net rental income from property rented for use in a trade or business activity in which you materially participate, so your self-rental profit cannot soak up passive losses from other rentals.
That matters if you were counting on suspended losses to shelter the rent; using suspended passive losses in a 1031 exchange works through the interaction.
Section 1031(f) asks who you exchanged with, not who signs the lease
Section 1031(f)(1) fires only where the property you hand over in the exchange goes to a related person. Leasing the replacement to a relative afterwards is not an exchange and does not start that clock; see the two-year rule for related-party exchanges.
What a family tenancy does risk is the holding requirement itself, which is a question of intent and documentation rather than of statutory timing. Rent below market is the single fact most likely to persuade an examiner that you bought a home for a relative rather than an investment.
These rules interact with gift tax and with your own state's landlord-tenant law, so confirm the lease and the rent with your CPA or attorney before the exchange closes.
Related questions
My parents are on a fixed income. Can I charge them less than market?
Not without losing the relief. Section 280A(d)(3)(A) applies only to a rental at a fair rental, so a discount pushes every day of their occupancy back into your personal use under 280A(d)(2)(A).
Are my in-laws family for this purpose?
Not under section 267(c)(4), which reaches only a spouse, siblings, ancestors and lineal descendants. But 280A(d)(2)(C) still treats occupancy by anyone as personal use on any day the unit is not rented at a fair rental, so the pricing discipline is the same. See who counts as a related party.
Can I let my son live there rent-free and take a gift-tax position instead?
No. Free occupancy is personal use on every day, which defeats the investment holding requirement the exchange depends on; what disqualifies a 1031 exchange lists the other ways this goes wrong.
Does renting to my own LLC make this a related-party exchange?
No. Section 1031(f) looks at the counterparty to the exchange, not the tenant. Buying the building from an entity you control is the transaction that raises the issue; see buying replacement property from a relative.
Can my daughter eventually buy the house from me?
She can, and a later sale to her can itself be a 1031 exchange for you with disclosure on Form 8824 Part II; selling to a family member sets out the conditions.
Sources
Checked against these publications on September 19, 2026. Rules and figures change; confirm the current version with your CPA or attorney before you act. This page is general information, not tax or legal advice.
- 26 U.S.C. §280A(d) - use as residence, personal use, and rental to a family member for use as a principal residence
- Rev. Proc. 2008-16 - dwelling unit safe harbor, sections 4.02 to 4.04
- 26 U.S.C. §267(c)(4) - members of a family
- Treas. Reg. §1.469-2(f)(6) - property rented to a nonpassive activity
- Legal 1031, Renting to a Relative (discussing Adams v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2013-7)
